We have discussed so many times, the art of Andy Warhol.  It seems that, at the very least, Danto and Carroll have mentioned his Brillo Box,  and possibly Dickie, and others as well.  Why? In my opinion, it is the aspect of ordinary objects that Warhol can make art.  In our constant discussion of defining art, what better to examine than a work of widely considered art, which, as far as content goes, should not be?  It is for this reason that many art critics look to the external factors in Warhol's work to fine tune their definitions or theories of defining art, or judging the quality of the artworld.